论仲裁程序与破产程序之冲突与协调  

Conflict and Coordination between Arbitration Procedure and Bankruptcy Procedure

作　　者：刘冰 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《法学杂志》2018年第3期131-140,共10页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"企业破产中的环境债权研究"(项目编号:15YJC820078);国家法治与法学理论研究项目"互联网金融平台市场退出之法律规制研究"(项目编号:16SFB3038);中国政法大学校级人文社科研究青年项目"破产企业的环境责任研究"(项目编号:15ZFQ82002)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：同为处理争议的程序性规范,仲裁程序与破产程序的冲突根源源于两者法本位的不同,即个人本位与社会本位的矛盾。协调两者之间的冲突,应当秉持社会公共利益具有优先性的原则,具体体现为破产程序的集中管辖制度对仲裁协议的影响、破产程序启动和进行中对仲裁程序的限制,及破产程序对仲裁裁决执行的回应。因此,当仲裁程序有利于社会公益的维护时,破产程序应当保持谦抑性,以便发挥仲裁程序的特有优势。我国立法在两个程序冲突的协调问题上法律缺位,应当结合上述协调理念,在破产法院的专属管辖权和债权人的监督权等规定上作出相应完善。The conflict between procedural norms, arbitral proceedings and insolvency proceedings is rooted in the difference between the two laws, that is, the contradiction between personal and social standards. To coordinate the conflict between the two, we should uphold the principle of giving priority to the social public interest, which is embodied in the influence of the centralized jurisdiction system on the arbitration agreement, the commencement of the bankruptcy procedure and the restriction on the arbitration procedure, Response to the execution of the arbitral award. Thus, when the arbitral proceedings are conducive to the maintenance of social welfare, the insolvency proceedings should remain modest in order to exert the particular advantages of the arbitral proceedings. China＇ s legislation in the conflict between the two procedures on the lack of legal issues, should be combined with the concept of coordination in the bankruptcy court exclusive jurisdiction and the right to supervise the creditors and other provisions to make a corresponding improvement.

关 键 词：仲裁程序 破产程序 冲突 协调 

分 类 号：D922.291.92[政治法律—经济法学]