检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北大学经济管理学院
出 处:《软科学》2018年第3期20-24,共5页Soft Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(16BJY104);陕西省社会科学基金面向“十三五”重大理论与实践问题研究项目(2016ZDA18);西北大学研究生自主创新项目(YZZ15049)
摘 要:基于中国1997~2014年省级面板数据,采用面板分位数回归方法研究政府主导、产业结构变迁对城乡收入差距的影响效应。结果表明:政府主导这一经济特征使得城乡资源配置和经济政策存在扭曲,城乡收入差距被显著扩大,而且在城乡收入差距较大的地区这种效应更强;产业结构合理化变迁对城乡收入差距的影响因城乡收入差距水平的不同而存在异质性,产业结构高级化变迁对城乡收入差距的影响存在显著的倒“U”型特征;在考虑到产业结构变迁的政府主导这一性质后发现,政府主导的产业结构合理化、高级化变迁可以显著地缩小城乡收入差距,并进一步讨论了政府主导、产业结构变迁对城乡收入差距影响的区域异质性特征。Based on the provincial panel data from 1997 to 2014 in China, this paper studies the effect of government domi- nance and industrial structure changes on the urban-rural income gap by panel quantile regression method. Results show that the government dominates economic characteristic makes the allocation of urban and rural resources and economic policies distort, the urban-rural income gap has been significantly expanded, and this effect is more obvious in the region with large urban-rural income. The influence of the rationalization changes in industrial structure on the urban-rural income gap exists heterogeneity because of the difference in the urban-rural income gap, and the influence of the advanced changes in industri- al structure on the urban-rural income gap has a significant inverted "U" type. After considering the characteristics of the government dominance to the change of industrial structure, it finds out that the rationalization and advanced changes of in- dustrial structure can significantly reduce the urban-rural income gap, and further discusses the regional heterogeneity of the influence of government dominance and industrial structure changes on the urban-rural income gap.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28