终身监禁制度的法律定位与溯及力  

Legal Positioning and Retroactive Force of Life Imprisonment System:Based on the Doctrinal Position of Criminal Law

作　　者：王志祥 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2018年第2期31-41,共11页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2012WZD11)

摘　　要：终身监禁是依附于死缓而存在的刑罚措施。《刑法修正案(九)》对终身监禁型死缓的引入,提升了死缓制度的层次性。死缓制度的内部由此呈现出从普通死缓过渡到限制减刑的死缓再到终身监禁型死缓的轻重程度不同的衔接。终身监禁型死缓不属于死刑立即执行的替代措施,其应当适用于不符合判处死刑立即执行的条件、判处普通死缓又不能体现罪责刑相适应原则的犯有重特大贪污受贿罪的犯罪分子。终身监禁的溯及力问题实际上是终身监禁是否死刑立即执行的替代措施问题的延伸。在原本应当判处死刑立即执行的情况下,不应当承认终身监禁具有溯及既往的效力。Life imprisonment is a penal measure attached to the execution of suspension of death penalty.The introduction of life imprisonment in Criminal LawAmendment(IX)has added variance to the system of the execution of suspension of death penalty.Therefore,a transition appears in the penalty system from the ordinary suspended death penalty,to the suspended death penalty with commutation restriction and to the suspended death penalty with life imprisonment.The execution of suspension of death penalty with life imprisonment is not the alternative measure to the immediate execution of death penalty,and should be applied to the criminals of heavy corruption or bribery who don’t conform to the conditions of either immediate execution of death penalty sentence or the ordinary execution of suspension of death penalty sentence.The question of the retrospective effect of the issue is in fact an extension of the question whether it is the alternative measure to the immediate execution of death penalty.In the case that requires the immediate execution of the death penalty,the retrospective effect of the execution of suspension of death penalty with life imprisonment shouldn’t be admitted.

关 键 词：终身监禁 死刑缓期执行 死刑立即执行 替代措施 溯及力 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]