美国专利间接侵权默示许可抗辩的反思与借鉴  

Reflection and Reference to Patent Implied License Defense against Patent Indirect Infringement in the United States

作　　者：朱雪忠 李闯豪 

机构地区：[1]同济大学上海国际知识产权学院,上海200092

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2018年第2期179-190,共12页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(12&ZD073)"促进自主创新能力建设的国家知识产权政策体系研究"

摘　　要：专利间接侵权的默示许可抗辩源于美国,随着美国专利间接侵权制度的发展产生并形成一定的适用标准。然而,在相关案例中,美国法院对该标准中"销售具体情形"的限制性解释,不合理地扩大了默示许可原则的适用,严重削弱了专利间接侵权制度的基础。为有效平衡各方利益,在专利间接侵权默示许可抗辩的适用中应加强对专利权人合法利益的考量,与此同时,默示许可的判定应着重分析第三方购买者的信赖利益范围。我国司法实践中尚无适用默示许可原则进行专利间接侵权抗辩的案件,美国相关方面的经验和教训可为我国今后的司法实践提供借鉴。The doctrine of implied license which provides a viable defense against claims of indirect infringement of patents originated from the USA, has gradually formed a certain standard in practices. However, the restrictive interpretation of the circumstances of the sale＇of the Bandag implied license standard in the relevant cases, has unreasonably enlarged the applying scope of the implied license standard in patent indirect infringement practices, which seriously impaired the basis of patent indirect infringement system. In order to balance the interests of all parties effectively in the application of implied license defense against patent indirect infringement, the consideration of the legal interests of the patent owner should be strengthened, and emphases should be laid on analyzing the scope of reliance interest of the third - party buyer. Considering that there have been no cases applying patent implied license against the patent indirect infringement in China, this paper provides useful reference for the judicial practice in the future with the experiences and lessons learned from the USA.

关 键 词：专利间接侵权 默示许可 抗辩 适用标准 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学] DD913