检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建工程学院土木工程学院,福建福州350118 [2]地下工程福建省高校重点实验室,福建福州350118
出 处:《福建工程学院学报》2018年第1期1-7,共7页Journal of Fujian University of Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(51678153);福建省教育厅产学研重点科技项目(JA12227);福州市科技计划项目(2017-G-69)
摘 要:从计算思路、计算过程等方面详细介绍了现有高强预应力混凝土板桩的两种抗裂弯矩计算方法,将板桩生产企业采用的抗裂弯矩计算方法和钢筋混凝土规范(GB50010-2010)的计算方法进行对比,分析了两种算法特点及适用范围。通过试验和工程应用进行验证,得出两种算法在计算思路、过程及结果上的差异和产生差异的原因,为高强预应力板桩的设计和发展提供了新思路。Two methods for calculating crack-resistance moment of the pre-stressed high-strength concrete sheet piles were introduced in detail from their ways of thinking and calculation process. The method adopted by sheet pile manufacturers and the one adopted in the Code for Reinforced Concrete (GB50010-2010) were compared for their characteristics and application scopes. Compari- son results were verified through tests and field applications. Differences in the way of thinking, processes and results were pointed out as well as causes of such differences. A new way of thinking for the design and development of high-strength pre-stressed sheet piles was put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145