检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]飞机/发动机综合系统安全性北京市重点实验室,北京100083 [2]先进航空发动机协同创新中心,北京100083 [3]北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院,北京100083
出 处:《北京航空航天大学学报》2018年第2期215-222,共8页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
基 金:长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT0905);中国博士后科学基金(2016M591047)~~
摘 要:针对换热情况下理想绝热单孔容腔模型瞬态响应预测误差大的现状,提出一种考虑换热对容腔瞬态响应影响的非绝热单孔容腔零维瞬态建模方法。通过研究影响气体与容腔壁面换热的因素,采用量纲分析推导了与换热相关的特征数方程,利用CFD数值模拟确定特征数方程的具体函数形式,显示表达了绝热单孔容腔模型未考虑的换热项,建立了非绝热单孔容腔零维瞬态模型。通过与数值模拟进行对比分析,结果表明:非绝热单孔容腔零维瞬态模型与CFD数值模拟计算的压力和温度的响应规律吻合很好,最大相对误差不超过0.8%,验证了模型的准确性和建模方法的可行性;绝热单孔容腔零维瞬态模型计算结果较CFD数值模拟结果的最大相对误差达6%,表明非绝热模型较绝热模型能够更精确地反映容腔真实响应规律。此外,非绝热单孔容腔零维瞬态模型与CFD数值模拟相比,在1%的精度水平下,降低了3个维度,也大幅降低了单孔容腔瞬态响应模拟的计算量,可以有效地支撑航空发动机空气系统中的容腔高精度建模。With the present condition that there are errors in predicting transient response of cavity with single opening using the ideal adiabatic cavity model in the presence of heat transfer,a zero-dimensional transient modeling method applied to a single opening cavity with the consideration of the effect of heat transfer on cavity transient response was proposed. In virtue of researching the factors influencing the heat transfer between the gas and the cavity wall,the characteristic equation related to heat transfer was deduced by dimensional analysis,and the concrete function of it was determined by CFD numerical simulation. The heat transfer term which was not considered by adiabatic model of cavity with single opening was expressed explicitly,and a non-adiabatic zero-dimensional transient model of cavity with single opening was established. The model was compared with CFD simulation and the results show that: Good agreement is achieved by comparing the responses of pressure and temperature calculated by non-adiabatic zero-dimensional transient model of cavity with single opening with that calculated by CFD simulation,and the maximum relative error is no more than0. 8%. The accuracy of the model and the feasibility of the modeling method are verified; The maximum relative error between the adiabatic model of cavity with single opening and CFD simulation results is 6%,which indicates that the non-adiabatic model can reflect the real response more accurately than the adiabatic model.In addition,the non-adiabatic model reduces three dimensions within the accuracy of 1% compared with the CFD simulation,and also significantly lowers the computational cost of non-adiabatic cavity with single opening simulation,which can effectively support zero-dimensional transient modeling of cavity with high accuracy in aero-engine air system.
分 类 号:V231.1[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.161