国际商事仲裁中书证开示规则的正当性探究——基于两项程序基本原则的互动  

A search for the Legal Justifications of Document Production in International Commercial Arbitration——an Analysis Based on the interaction between Two Principles

作　　者：杨昆波 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2017年第4期132-147,共16页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：仲裁争议各方的程序自治权、仲裁庭的程序自由裁量权原则贯穿了国际商事仲裁程序这一主题，同样作为基础原则，二者之间是否有效力或适用上的先后顺序是笔者希望解决的一个问题。与此同时，书证开示原则作为一项特殊的证据规则，其正当性依据何在是笔者希望讨论的另外一个问题。本文通过逐步探讨书证开示规则下两项原则的运用与互动，得出结论仲裁庭的程序裁量权需受制于当事人的程序自治，其中，程序自治原则为书证开示的正当性提供了第一位的基础，而仲裁庭的程序裁量作为程序自治的补充为书证开示提供了第二位的基础。Parties＇ procedural autonomy, procedural discretion of arbitral tribunal are two fundamental principles underlying the procedural aspect of international commercial arbitration. However, vital as they all are, is there a priority of application of the two principles.9 This is the first problem on which this article focuses. As a kind of procedural tool for evidence-taking, which two of the above mentioned principles does documentproduction base itself on is another problem needs solving. Through evaluating the undergoing of document production against the background of the two main principles, this article comes to the conclusion that procedural discretion of arbitral tribunal exists as a supple- mentary principle to parties＇ procedural autonomy. And among two principles, it is the parties＇ procedural autonomy that gives the prime legal jus- tification of documentproduction.

关 键 词：程序自治 程序裁量 书证开示 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]