法定主义、兜底条款与法官造法——《著作权法》第十条第一款第(17)项的解释论  

Numerus Clausus,Save Clause and the Judge-made Law

作　　者：杜志浩 

机构地区：[1]德国哥廷根大学法学院

出　　处：《财经法学》2018年第1期108-121,共14页Law and Economy

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究"(项目编号:12BFX083);国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(项目编号:留金发[2014]3026号)

摘　　要：对知识产权法定主义的论证,应先予考察法定主义在私法中的源流及功能。物权法定主义的形式理由在于维持物债二分之体系,其法政策目的则在于维护法律安定性及公众自由,上述理由同样适用于著作权法定。法定主义与法官造法并非对立范畴,而是原则与例外的关系。《著作权法》第十条的兜底条款仅为法官造法的授权规范,并未否弃法定主义的立场。法定主义要求著作权的种类规范和内容规范原则上应独占适用,唯在例外情况下才能进行法官造法。The demonstration of the numerus clausus principle in intellectual property law is based on the premise that we have figured out the origin and function of this doctrine in private law.The numerus clausus is one of the structural principles building the system of civil law with a division between Sachenrechte and Forderungsrechte.Its legal policy is aimed at safeguarding the stability of the law and public freedom.All of above applies to the numerus clausus of copyrights.The numerus clausus and the law making of judges are not antagonistic categories,but indicate a relationship between rule and exception.The save clause in Article 10 of the current Chinese Copyright Law is nothing more than a legislative authority of the judge-made law, which in itself did not mean that the numerus clausus was abandoned.Accordingly the norms about categories and contents of copyrights should be exclusively applied and the judge-made law can only occur in exceptional circumstances.

关 键 词：知识产权法定主义 著作权法定主义 私法体系 兜底条款 法官造法 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]