检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京100872 [2]国家林业局经济发展研究中心,北京100714
出 处:《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第2期42-48,共7页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国务院三峡办科研项目(2013HXKY2-2)
摘 要:基于三峡库区生态屏障区的1 080户农户调查数据,利用分位数回归和OLS分组回归的方法,分析了不同生态补偿形式对农户家庭收入的影响,进而验证生态补偿能否实现精准扶贫。研究发现:生态林、退耕还林和经济林等三种现金补偿方式更有利于高收入农户;长江绿化项目雇员等工作岗位型补偿在低分位数上显著提升了农户的家庭收入。现行三峡生态屏障区生态补偿政策起到了一定的益贫作用,但为实现精准脱贫的目标,后续应考虑到农户异质性以扩大其适应范围,并注重措施的长期性执行和保障机制的完善。This paper uses grouping regression and quantile regression method to analyze 1 080 peasant households' survey data of the ecological barrier area around the Three Gorges reservoir,and studies the effects of different types of ecological compensation on peasant household income to find out whether ecological compensation benefits targeted poverty alleviation.The result shows that three kinds of land cash compensation in upper quantile significantly increased farmers' income,including ecological forest compensation.Yangtze River landscaping project employees' compensation on the low quantile significantly enhance the income of farm households and there is no impact in mid digits.The compensation policy has alleviated poverty in someway.But we should consider more about the heterogeneity of farmers,change the compensation policy in order to achieve the goal of poverty reduction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.165.252