《文选·赋》题注与作者注引文辨证四题——李善注与“五臣注”引文研究之一  

Dialectical Studies on Citations within Commentary on Titles and Authors of Credit Lines in Wen Xuan——On Citations in Li Shan's Commentary and “Five Officials Commentary”

作　　者：力之[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第6期90-96,共7页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：李善与李周翰各引《汉书》为杨雄小传,然前者疏忽而将杨雄之"卒"提早了二十余年;后者所引则多非出此书。《北征赋》之作者下,李善与李周翰所引《汉书》皆非《汉书》:前者有潜意识所致之失;后者则将《流别论》之文放到所引书中。李善引《大家集》之"陈留长"原当作"陈留长垣县长";而李周翰注之"《后汉书》云"中有非此书者。吕向引"《史记》云"之"宋玉,郢人也"云云,实非出《史记》。从"失"的角度仅就文中所及四例言,李善注之失多因疏忽或潜意识所致;而"五臣注"的问题则主要缘其做法本身。Li Han and Li Zhouhan cited Hanshu for Yang Xiong as a biography,but the former mistook Yang＇s death time 20 years early because of negligence and the latter＇s citation is not from Hanshu.The author of North Expeditionthought that Hanshuto which Li Shan and Li Zhouhan referred was not real Hanshu,the former misled by subconsciousness and the latter referred the contents of the theory of tributary.The＂Chen Liuchang＂in＂The Collection＂by Li Shan was originally supposed to be＂Chen Liu Changyuan county magistrate＂.The Book of Later Han quoted by Li Zhouhan contained content that is not part of that book.The＂Song Yu,Ying Ren＂in Shih Chi quoted by Lyu Xiang did not come from the historical records.From the prospective of＂mistaking＂,in terms of the four examples in this article,Li Shan＇s mistakes were mostly due to negligence and unconsciousness.But the problem of＂five Officials＇ annotation＂resulted from its compiling way itself.

关 键 词：《文选》 题注 作者注 引文 潜意识 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]