检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐伟[1] 鞠忠建[1] 王小深[1] 韩玮[1] 张鸣扬 蒋培源 刚颖[1]
出 处:《医疗卫生装备》2018年第2期60-64,共5页Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
基 金:解放军总医院转化医学基金(105059)
摘 要:目的:探讨腹部肿瘤通过锥形束CT扫描纠正摆位误差后对治疗剂量实施的准确性影响,以对临床放疗提供指导。方法:采用双盲法选取6例腹部肿瘤患者,每次治疗时利用电子射野影像装置(electronical portal imaging device,EPID)采集剂量学信息,利用EDOSE工具进行三维剂量重建,对患者的治疗计划完成实时三维剂量验证。每例患者行图像引导与未行图像引导各采集5组数据,共60组数据,比较图像引导后再治疗与直接治疗2种情况下实时三维剂量验证的结果。结果:治疗前锥形束CT图像引导能够在一定程度上纠正摆位误差,但总体γ通过率与未行图像引导相比并未体现出优势,患者靶区的覆盖率亦没有提高,正常组织受量方面也没有明显优势。结论:对于腹部肿瘤患者,现行的按照骨性标记来配准的图像引导纠正摆位误差后,患者治疗过程中三维剂量验证结果没有得到明显改善,治疗剂量实施准确性没有得到明显提高。Objective To investigate the effect of the correction of the position error of the abdominal tumor by cone beamscanning. Six patients with abdominal tumor were selected with double -blind method, and electronical portalimaing device was used to collect the information of the patient dosimetry during radiotherapy. EDOSE tool was applied to 3Ddose reconstruction so as to execute real-time 3D dose verification of the treatment plan. Each patient had 5 sets of dataacquired when image guidance existed and another 5 sets when image guidance was absent. The treatment effects with orwithout image guidance were compared. The overall 酌 passing rate with cone beam CT image guidance gained noadvantages over that without image guidance, though the setup error was corrected to some extent. Image guidancecontributed nothing to increasing target area coverage while decreasing exposure dose to normal tissue. Setuperror correction by the image guidance based on bone marker has no significant effect on improving 3D dose verification anddose accuracy during the radiotherapy of the abdominal tumor patient.
分 类 号:R318[医药卫生—生物医学工程] R815[医药卫生—基础医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62