入世议定书中的超WTO和负WTO规则的正当性缺失问题及其解决路径  

The Legitimacy Crisis of WTO National Specific Rules and its Solution——Reflections on the Rules of “WTO-plus”Rules and “WTO-minus”Rules in the China Accession Protocol

作　　者：周艳云[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,南京211189

出　　处：《中州大学学报》2018年第1期54-58,共5页Journal of Zhongzhou University

基　　金：2014年度国家社科基金重点项目"WTO争端解决中的中国现象与中国问题研究"(14AFX027)

摘　　要：中国入世议定书中含有大量超WTO和负WTO规则,世贸组织在制定超WTO和负WTO规则时不经过正式的规则修正程序就增加加入成员国在世贸组织的基本条约下的义务。超WTO和负WTO规则制定上的无规性违反WTO的实质公平与程序公正原则,并引发诸多贸易争端。入世议定书中的超WTO和负WTO规则的正当性问题凸显。如何保障入世议定书中的超WTO和负WTO规则的正当性是学界亟需研究解决的问题。入世议定书中的超WTO和负WTO规则的制定应遵循实质公平原则和新旧成员权利义务统一原则,颁布其权威解释,增强其透明度,是解决其正当性缺失问题的有效路径。The Chinese accession protocol of WTO contains a large number of the national specific rules,such as "WTO-plus"rules and "WTO-minus"rules. The unprincipled and undisciplined nature in shaping the national specific rules has caused many national specific rules to violate the principle of procedural justice and substantive fairness,and led to numerous trade disputes. The national specific rules face the crisis of legitimacy. How to resolve the crisis and give the legitimacy of the national specific rules is a problem that needs to be studied and solved by the WTO and the academicians. The formulation of the national specific rules should be based on the predetermined difference standards,and follow the principle of unanimity between the old and new members,publish their authoritative interpretations as soon as possible,and enhance their transparency. They are the effective ways to resolve the legitimacy crisis of the national specific rules.

关 键 词：入世议定书 超WTO规则 负WTO规则 正当性 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]