国际汉语教学中近义虚词辨析的方法与理据  

Methods and Evidences of Differentiating Similarative Function Words in International Chinese Teaching

作　　者：邵敬敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学文学院,广东广州510632

出　　处：《语言文字应用》2018年第1期41-50,共10页Applied Linguistics

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"汉语虚词词典编撰的方法论探讨及其实践"(12BYY101)的成果之一

摘　　要：在国际汉语教学中,近义虚词的辨析历来是难点,也是重点。进行近义虚词的辨析,最基本的方法是比较。本文提出辨析近义虚词的七种方法,:一、词语组合分化法;二、词语同现验证法;三、语素异同对比法;四、主观客观情态法;五、数据差异对照法;六、词源原型追溯法;七、多元综合比较法。不管运用哪种方法,最后都需要找到验证的标记,并且在理据上做出合理解释。Differentiation of similarative function words, mainly discussed by comparison,is a difficult task but is highlighted in International Chinese Teaching. This paper proposes seven comparative methods,namely combination and polarization of words,verification of co-occurrence of words,comparison of the similarities and differences of morphemes,comparison of the mood of subjectivity and objectivity,comparison of data discrepancy,retrospect of the prototype of etymology, and multiple and synthetical comparison. It is worth noting that whatever method is used,it is vital to verify the markers and give reasonable explanations.

关 键 词：精准性 解释性 科学性 方法与理据 多元综合比较 

分 类 号：H19[语言文字—汉语]