检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省威海市立医院重症医学科,中国威海264200 [2]山东省青岛市市立医院重症医学科,中国青岛266011
出 处:《国际老年医学杂志》2018年第1期37-39,共3页International Journal of Geriatrics
摘 要:目的 分析老年重症感染患者ICU治疗时间状况并探讨其影响因素.方法 采用自制表格按照ICU治疗时间将78例老年患者分为≤48 h组和〉48 h组分别收集资料进行对比分析.结果 ICU治疗时间≤48 h组的慢病史构成比(53.8%)低于〉48 h组(86.5%),MAP、 氧合指数高于〉48 h组,乳酸水平、APACHE-Ⅱ评分、SOFA评分、DIC发病率、MODS发病率均低于〉48 h组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).氧合指数、 乳酸水平、APACHE-II评分、SOFA评分、DIC、MODS是影响老年患者ICU治疗时间的重要因素.结论 氧合指数是影响老年重症感染患者ICU治疗时间的有利因素,乳酸水平、APACHE-II评分、SOFA评分、DIC、MODS是危险因素.Objective To analyze the treatment time and influencing factors of intensive care unit (ICU) in the elderly patients with severe infection. Methods By using self - made questionnaire and according to the ICU treatment time, 78 elderly patients were divided into ≤48 h group and 〉48 h group and the data was collected and analyzed respectively. Results The proportion of the patients with chronic disease in ≤48 h group (53.8%) was lower than that in 〉48 h group (86. 5% ) ; MAP and oxygenation index in ≤48 h group were higher than those in 〉48 h group, Lactate level, APACHE - Ⅱ score, SOFA score, DIC morbidity and MODS morbidity in ≤48 h group were lower than those in 〉48 h group. There was significant difference between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 05). Oxygenation index, lactate levels, APACHE - Ⅱ score, SOFA score, DIC and MODS were the important factors of ICU treatment time in the elderly patients with severe infection. Conclusion Oxygenation index is a favorable factor. The lactate level, APACHE -Ⅱ score, SOFA score, DIC and MODS are the risk factors for ICU treatment time in elderly patients with severe infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222