检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学体育与运动学院,北京100875
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2018年第2期197-199,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助;北京师范大学自主科研基金项目(SKZZY2014086)
摘 要:目的探讨幼儿体操对粗大动作发展的影响,为幼儿体育教育和身体活动提供理论依据。方法随机抽取北京某公立幼儿园5~6岁幼儿40名为研究对象,随机均分为对照组和实验组,实验组进行幼儿体操训练(60 min/次,2次/周,共12周),采用粗大动作发展测试(Test of Gross Motor Development,TGMD-2)作为评价工具,对受试者进行位移性动作和物控性动作测试,评价粗大动作发展水平。结果幼儿体操运动干预前,对照组(10.12±2.97)和实验组(8.97±2.72)粗大动作得分差异无统计学意义(F=0.933,P>0.05);幼儿体操运动干预后,对照组(12.69±3.08)和实验组(15.32±3.11)较干预前粗大动作得分均提高(t值分别为-2.346,-2.021,P值均<0.05),且实验组粗大动作发展水平高于对照组(F=4.476,P<0.05)。结论体操运动可提升5~6岁幼儿位移和物控动作得分,促进粗大动作发展。建议在幼儿动作发展关键期选用合适的体操内容干预,为幼儿身体素质发展奠定良好基础。Objective To investigate possible effects of child gymnastics on gross motor development. Methods Forty children aged 5-6 years old were randomly divided into exercise and control group. Children in the exercise group received twice/week( 60 mins every time) gymnastics for 12 weeks. Test of Gross Motor Development( TGMD-2) was used to assess gross motor development level. Results Before intervention,gross motor development scores showed no significant difference between exercise and control group( F = 0.933,P〉0.05). After intervention,increases in gross motor development was observed in both control and exercise group( t =-2.346,-2.021,P〈0.05),more significant in exercise group( F = 4.476,P〈0.05). Conclusion Child gymnastics might help improving gross motor development,suggesting gymnastics is one of the most comprehensive lifestyle exercise boosting child' s overall physical fitness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145