机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属第一医院核医学科,沈阳110001
出 处:《中华核医学与分子影像杂志》2018年第3期164-167,共4页Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
摘 要:目的探讨131I治疗后全身显像(Rx-WBS)对分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者131I治疗后唾液腺损伤发生风险的预测价值。方法回顾性分析2015年4月至2015年6月间24例(男8例,女16例;年龄26-64岁) DTC术后首次行131I治疗且在^131I治疗后2-4 d行Rx-WBS的患者。所有患者(48个腮腺,48个颌下腺)在^131I治疗前1 d行唾液腺动态显像(SGS)均提示唾液腺功能正常,其中21例(42个腮腺,42个颌下腺)131I治疗后3个月复查时行SGS。分别从SGS结果和临床表现判断唾液腺损伤情况,并将Rx-WBS图像上唾液腺对131I的浓聚情况[唾液腺放射性计数与本底放射性计数比值(SUR)]与其对比。采用Mann-Whitney u检验分析数据,利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析计算SUR预测唾液腺炎性损伤的灵敏度。结果根据SGS结果分组,腮腺功能降低组(n=12)和腮腺功能正常组(n=30)的Rx-WBS所测SUR分别为3.60(2.55,4.33)和2.75(2.33,3.29)(z=-2.005,P〈0.05)。Rx-WBS图像上,颌下腺功能降低者(n=15)与功能正常者(n=27)SUR差异无统计学意义(z=-0.144,P〉0.05)。腮腺炎组(n=32)和颌下腺炎组(n=28) SUR均高于对应的无炎性病变组[n=16,3.16(2.53,4.01)和2.49(2.06,2.81);n=20,4.43(2.67,7.61)和2.93(1.92,4.65);z值:-3.073和-2.740,均P〈0.05]; SUR阈值分别取2.97和3.66时,其预测发生腮腺炎和颌下腺炎的灵敏度分别为59%(19/32)和64%(18/28)。结论可通过Rx-WBS来预测DTC患者131I治疗后唾液腺损伤的发生风险。Objective To evaluate the predictive value of posttreatment whole body scan (Rx-WBS) for radiation damage to the salivary glands in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).Methods From April 2015 to June 2015, 24 patients (8 males, 16 females; age: 26-64 years) with DTC, who accepted ^131I therapy only one time and underwent Rx-WBS 2-4 d after 131I treatment, were recruited from the First Hospital of China Medical University. All patients had normal salivary glands function on salivary gland scintigraphy (SGS) performed on the day before ^131I treatment, and 21 patients underwent SGS again 3 months after 131I treatment. The SGS results and clinical manifestations were used to evaluate the function of salivary glands after 131I therapy. Rx-WBS was analyzed by visual analysis and quantitative analysis (salivary gland to background uptake ratios, SUR). The SUR was compared between patient groups with different function of salivary glands. Mann-Whitney u test was used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the sensitivity of SUR for predicting the salivary gland damage.Results The SUR in dysfunctional parotid glands (n=12) was significantly higher than that in other glands with normal function (n=30; 3.60(2.55, 4.33) vs 2.75(2.33, 3.29); z=-2.005, P〈0.05). The SUR was not different between submandibular glands with lower function (n=15) and those with normal function (n=27; z=-0.144, P〉0.05). The SUR of parotid glands (n=32) in patients with parotitis was significantly higher than that in others (n=16; 3.16(2.53, 4.01) vs 2.49(2.06, 2.81); z=-3.073, P〈0.05). The SUR of submandibular glands (n=28) in patients with sialadenitis was significantly higher than that in others (n=20; 4.43(2.67, 7.61) vs 2.93(1.92, 4.65); z=-2.740, P〈0.05). When 2.97 and 3.66 were selected as cutoff values, the sensitivities of SUR for predicting parotitis and sialadenitis were 59%(19/32) and 64%�
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...