检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]赣南医学院心理学系,江西赣州341000 [2]赣南医学院第一附属医院心理咨询门诊 [3]赣南医学院农村医学教育研究中心
出 处:《中国校医》2018年第1期1-3,5,共4页Chinese Journal of School Doctor
基 金:江西省卫计委科技项目(20175555);2016年江西省学位与研究生教育教学改革研究项目(jxyjg2016155)
摘 要:目的编制大学生心理咨询倾向性问卷。方法在查阅文献和前期访谈基础上编制问卷。进行3次大一学生的整群抽样,第一次调查315名大一学生用于初步项目分析和因素探索;第二次调查584名大一学生用于探索性因素分析和问卷信、效度检测;第三次调查101名大一学生用于验证性因素分析,以专业心理求助态度量表为效标,并进行重测。结果大学生心理咨询倾向性问卷共19个题目,包括心理咨询偏见、心理咨询信任、非专业心理求助途径、心理咨询污名4个因子。验证性因素分析表明所得模型拟合度可接受(χ~2/df=2.677,GFI=0.932,AGFI=0.912,CFI=0.916,NFI=0.874,RMSEA=0.054)。总问卷内部一致性系数总量表为0.878,各因子α为0.685~0.845;总量表重测信度为0.885,4个因子重测信度为0.693~0.836。结论本研究编制的问卷具有较好的信度和效度,可用于评估大学生心理咨询倾向性。Objective To develop a psychological counseling tendency questionnaire for college students. Meth- oils Based on the literature review and preliminary interview research, the questionnaire was constructed. Three cluster sampling tests were conducted. The first sample of 315 college students was investigated with pre-questionnaire for item analysis. The second sample of 584 college students was conducted for the exploratory factor analysis and homogeneous re- liability and construct validity. The last sample of 101 college students was conducted with the questionnaire for the confir- matory factor analysis and attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help, and the college students were tested a- gain.Results The final questionnaire consisted of 19 items, including 4 factors, namely bias of psychological counseling, trust of psychological counseling, non professional way of psychological counseling, and stigma of psychological counseling, In the comminatory factor analysis, the questionnaire had acceptable fit indices (k2/df=2.677, GFI=0.932, AGFI=0.912, CFI=0.916, NFI=0.874, RblSEA=O.054), indicating good structure validity. Cronbach ot of the whole questionnaire was 0.878, and ranged 0.685-0.845 for each factor, and the test-retested reliability was 0.885 and its 4 factors were 0.693- 0.836. Conclusion The questionnaire developed has good reliability and validity, and can be used in related studies.
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222