检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张鞠华 顾佩莉[3] 徐春巍 查海东 陆瑞峰 闵利时 周芬敏
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学,上海201203 [2]上海健康医学院附属周浦医院 [3]上海市浦东新区人民医院
出 处:《中国中医骨伤科杂志》2018年第3期14-16,共3页Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics
基 金:上海市浦东新区卫生和计划生育委员会重点专科(PWZZK-2017-08);上海市浦东新区卫生和计划生育委员会科技发展专项基金资助项目(PW2015A-26);上海市浦东新区周浦医院重点学科项目(ZP-XK-2015B-5)
摘 要:目的:观察两步手法联合中药汽疗治疗神经根型颈椎病临床疗效。方法:采用随机对照法将神经根型颈椎病患者80例随机分为两步手法联合中药汽疗(观察组)40例,中药汽疗组(对照组)40例,对比分析两组临床疗效。结果:治疗组总有效率92.5%,对照组总有效率77.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组临床疗效优于对照组。结论:两步手法联合中药汽疗治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效更确切。Objective:To observe the clinical effect of two-step manipulation on nerve root type cervical spondylosis.Methods:80 cases of nerve root type cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into two groups,40 cases were treated with traditional Chinese medicine and steam therapy(observation group),and 40 cases with traditional Chinese medicine steam treatment group(control group),and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared and analyzed.Results:The total effective rate of the treatment group was 92.5%,and the total effective rate of the control group was 77.5%.The clinical efficacy of the treatment group was better than that of the control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion:The two-step manipulation combined with Chinese medicine steam treatment of nerve root type of cervical spondylosis is more accurate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3