检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:巩俊英 张敏[2] 吴玉梅[1] 钟彬彬 李明娥[2]
机构地区:[1]滨州医学院附属医院NICU,滨州256603 [2]滨州医学院附属医院护理部 [3]滨州市邹平县中医院儿科
出 处:《滨州医学院学报》2018年第1期53-55,共3页Journal of Binzhou Medical University
摘 要:目的观察体位疗法联合非营养性吸吮对缓解早产儿眼底视网膜筛查所致疼痛的效果。方法选取2016年8月—2017年10月在我院NICU住院治疗的早产儿共计200人作为研究对象,随机分为2组,实验组(体位疗法加非营养性吸吮100例),对照组(非营养性吸吮100例),使用早产儿疼痛评估工具(PIPP)作为疼痛程度的客观评价指标。结果本次研究两种非药物性干预措施下早产儿PIPP得分均大于7分。实验组和对照组PIPP得分分别为(10.02±1.414)分、(11.13±1.529)分。实验组在筛查后PIPP得分低于对照组(P<0.001)。结论两种干预措施并不能完全缓解患儿疼痛。住院早产儿在进行眼底筛查时体位疗法联合非营养性吸吮比单纯使用非营养性吸吮能更好地缓解患儿疼痛。Objective To observe the effect of the postural therapy combined with non-nutritive sucking on alleviating the pain caused by fundus retinal screening in preterm infants.Methods A total of 200 preterm infants who hospitalized in NICU from August 2016 to October 2017 in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups,experimental group(postural therapy with non-nutritive sucking in 100 cases)and control group(non nutritive sucking in 100 cases).The PIPP was used as an objective measure of the degree of pain.Results PIPP scores for preterm infants in this study were higher than 7 for both nonpharmacologic interventions.The PIPP scores of experimental group and control group were(10.02±1.414)points and(11.13±1.529)points respectively.The PIPP score of the experimental group after screening was lower than that of the control group(P〈0.001).Conclusion Both interventions did not completely relieve pain in preterm infants.Hospitalized preterm infants in fundus screening using postural therapy combined with non-nutritive sucking can better relieve pain than non-nutritive sucking alone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200