我国民法典制定背景下典权的命运刍议  

Destiny of Pawn Right in the Background of Civil Code

作　　者：段威[1] 刘灿 

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2018年第1期26-34,共9页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：中央民族大学2017年"青年学术团队引领计划"项目"民法总则制定与商事立法疑难问题研究"的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在《民法分则物权编》制定之际,不少学者主张应在《物权编》中引入典权制度,但是典权制度不符合时代特征、在司法实践中很少被使用、违反公平原则、易生纠纷、很难融入当今物权法体系,且法律中引入典权制度的效益远远低于制定和实施法律所耗费的社会成本,故法律中不应引入典权制度。在《民法总则》明文规定物权法定原则以及习惯可以作为民法法源的前提下,结合典权的性质以及该制度的历史演进和发展现状,虽然典权不能上升为物权,但是我们仍可以将典权制度作为用益债权性习惯长期保持适用下去。Many scholars advocate the introduction of pawning rights into the section of Property Rights in stipulating Civil Code.But the system of pawning rights,violating the principle of fairness and being liable to cause dispute,is not in line with the characteristics of the times and rarely used in judicial practice.It is difficult to integrate it into the current system of property law.The effectiveness of introducing the system of pawning rights into the law is far lower than the social cost of formulating and implementing the law.Therefore,the system of pawning rights should not be introduced into the law.General Provisions of Civil Lawexpressly stipulate that the legal principles and conventions of property right can be used as the source of civil law.Considering this premise,the nature of pawn rights and its evolution,the system of pawning rights can be taken as a creditor＇s right and continue to be practiced,although it may not escalate into the property right.

关 键 词：民法典制定 典权制度 物权法定原则 用益债权 习惯 

分 类 号：DF521[政治法律—民商法学]