检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧阳辉 林汉弟 林国良 OUYANG Hui, LIN Han-di, LIN Guo-liang.(Guangdong Jieyang Huilai County Ciyun Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jieyang 515200, Chin)
出 处:《中国实用医药》2018年第7期25-26,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的比较分析胃大部切除术与单纯穿孔修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效。方法 83例胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者,采用计算机随机分组法分为Ⅰ组(41例)和Ⅱ组(42例)。Ⅰ组患者给予胃大部切除术治疗,Ⅱ组患者给予单纯穿孔修补术治疗。比较两组患者的治疗效果、手术时间、住院时间及并发症发生情况。结果Ⅱ组患者治疗总有效率为97.62%,明显高于Ⅰ组的82.93%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Ⅱ组患者手术时间、住院时间短于Ⅰ组,并发症发生率低于Ⅰ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔可采用单纯穿孔修补术治疗,其疗效显著,并发症少,较胃大部切除术更有优势。Objective To compare and analyze the efficacy of subtotal gastrectomy and simple perforation repair in the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.Methods A total of 83 patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation were divided by computer random grouping method into group Ⅰ(41 cases) and group Ⅱ(42 cases).Group Ⅰ was treated with subtotal gastrectomy,and group Ⅱ was treated with simple perforation repair.Comparison were made on treatment effect,operation time,hospitalization time and occurrence of complications between the two groups.Results Group Ⅱ had obviously higher total treatment effective rate as 97.62% than 82.93% in group Ⅰ,and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Group Ⅱ had shorter operation time and hospitalization time than group Ⅰ,and lower incidence of complications than group Ⅰ.Their difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion Simple perforation repair can be used for clinical treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation,and its efficacy is remarkable with less complications.It has more advantages than subtotal gastrectomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166