经济开放加剧了国内市场分割吗——来自中国省级面板数据的实证检验  

Does Economic Opening Aggravate Domestic Market Segmentation? An Empirical Test on Provincial Panel Data in China

作　　者：刘刚[1] LIU Gang(School of International Trade and Economies, Anhui University of Finance and Economies, Bengbu 23303)

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学国际经济贸易学院,安徽蚌埠233030

出　　处：《财贸研究》2018年第1期16-26,共11页Finance and Trade Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年项目"国内市场分割演进的测度;分解及经济效应研究"(71303001)

摘　　要：基于中国2000—2014年的省际面板数据,利用"相对价格法"测度国内市场分割程度的时序变化,实证检验贸易开放和外资开放等经济开放因素及其他因素对国内市场分割的影响。研究发现:国内市场总体呈现逐渐整合的趋势,区域经济的市场整合进展并不优于全国整体水平;贸易开放对市场分割具有显著的负向影响,表明对外贸易有利于促进国内市场整合,外资开放对市场分割具有显著的正向效应,贸易开放与外资开放对国内市场分割呈现相反方向的作用效果;交通基础条件、地方政府干预经济的程度、流通企业规模和地方经济国有化程度也对市场分割具有不同影响。研究结论对于促进国内统一大市场建设,具有重要的政策启示意义。Based on the provincial panel data of China from 2010 to 2014, the relative price method is used to measure the degree of domestic market segmentation. The influence of economic openness including trade openness and foreign capital opening on the segmentation of domestic market is empirically tested. Re- suits show that domestic market is becoming increasingly integrated, the market integration of the regional e- conomy is not better than the overall level of the national level. Trade openness has a significant negative impact on market segmentation, indicating that foreign trade is conducive to promoting domestic market seg- mentation. The opening of foreign capital has a significant positive effect on market segmentation. The o- pening of trade and the opening of foreign capital have opposite effects on the segmentation of the domestic market. The basic conditions of transportation, the extent of local government intervention in the economy, the size of circulation enterprises and the degree of nationalization of local economies also have different im- pacts on market segmentation. This has important policy implications for promoting the construction of a u- nified domestic big market.

关 键 词：市场分割 贸易开放 外资开放 规模经济 

分 类 号：F724.7[经济管理—产业经济] F727