三个走向:农村集体经济组织的嬗变与分化——以深圳、苏州、宁海为样本的类型分析  

“Three Development Trends”: The Evolution and Differentiation of the Rural Collective Economic Organization:Shenzhen,Suzhou,Ninghai As Sample Type Analysis

作　　者：孙敏[1] SUN Min

机构地区：[1]武汉大学历史学院

出　　处：《农业经济问题》2018年第2期21-30,共10页Issues in Agricultural Economy

基　　金：教育部基金“完善基层社会治理机制研究”

摘　　要：基于深圳、苏州、宁海三地农村的田野调研发现,工业发达型农村集体经济＂收支结构＂的差异化变迁呈现了农村集体经济组织三种发展趋势：以深圳为代表的私人化、以苏州为代表的国家化和以宁海为代表的空壳化。早期工业化的不同路径奠定了集体组织异质化的历史基础,集体土地所有权的实现能力决定了集体组织＂造血＂功能的强弱,股份合作社的地方性实践形塑了集体组织差异化的政经关系。从上述三个维度剖析农村集体经济组织差异化变迁的实践逻辑及类型建构,有助于从中观层面为农村集体经济有效实行形式的探索提供学理依据。Based on the field surveys in rural areas in Shenzhen,Suzhou and Ninghai,it is found that the differentiated changes in ＂revenue and expenditure structure＂of the industrialized rural collective economy show three kinds of development trends in rural collective economic organizations： the personalization represented by Shenzhen,the nationalization represented by Suzhou and the hollowing trend represented by Ninghai. The different paths of early industrialization laid the historical foundation for the heterogeneity of collective organization; The ability to realize collective ownership of land determines the strength of the ＂hematopoietic function＂of collective organizations; The local practice of joint-stock cooperatives shaped the political and economic relationship. The analysis of the practical logic and the type construction of rural collective economic organizations＇ differentiated changes from the above three dimensions helps to provide a theoretical basis for the exploration of the effective forms of rural collective economy from the perspective of medium level.

关 键 词：集体经济 收支结构 早期工业化 集体土地所有权 政经分离 

分 类 号：F321.32[经济管理—产业经济]