检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向黎 陈玲莉 XIANG Li, CHEN Lingli(Dangyang City People's Hospital, Dangyang444100, Chin)
出 处:《中外医学研究》2018年第8期34-35,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:分析MIPPO(微创经皮钢板固定技术)、LCP(锁定加压钢板)联合治疗胫骨干骺端骨折的效果。方法:2014年2月-2016年12月,于笔者所在医院收治的胫骨干骺端骨折患者中选取100例,随机将其分为两组,超关节外固定支架术为对照组患者治疗方式,微创经皮钢板固定技术+锁定加压钢板内固定术为观察组患者治疗方式,对比两组临床疗效。结果:观察组优良率94%,对照组为60%,对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组骨折愈合时间短于对照组,并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:MIPPO、LCP联合治疗胫骨干骺端骨折的效果显著,值得推广。Objective: To analyze the effect of the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO) and locking compression plate fixation(LCP) in the treatment of tibial metaphyseal fractures.Method: From February 2014 to December 2016, 100 cases of tibial metaphyseal fractures in our hospital were selected, they were randomly divided into two groups, over articular external fixation operation for treatment of patients in the control group, the minimally invasive pereutaneous plate osteosynthesis and locking compression plate fixation for the treatment of patients in the observation group, the clinical curative effect of two groups were compared.Result: The excellent rate of the observation group was 94%, the control group was'60%, there was significant difference(P〈O.05), the observation group fracture healing time was shorter than the control group, the complication rate was lower than the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: The combined treatment of MIPPO and LCP in the treatment of tibial metaphyseal fractures have significant effect, are worth of the promotion.
关 键 词:微创经皮钢板固定技术 锁定加压钢板 胫骨干骺端骨折 骨折愈合时间
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.173.228