检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐尚昆[1] XU Shangkun(School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 10087)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学哲学院
出 处:《中国人民大学学报》2018年第2期152-161,共10页Journal of Renmin University of China
摘 要:传统"高—低信任格局二分"的静态观点与"制度—文化二元对立"的信任来源理论在一定程度上成为制约我国信任重建的思维桎梏。中国当前信任危机的原因并非传统人际信任的崩塌,而是现代普遍信任的缺位。如何构建适合现代社会的普遍信任是中国信任重建的核心任务。信任是在制度与文化交互作用下生产与再生产出来的,在中国,信任的重建,一方面要确立一套适应普遍信任产生的制度安排,另一方面要将这套制度规范上升为人们对于社会公平正义的价值共识。The traditional static view of "high-low trust pattern dichotomy" and the perspective of "institutional-cultural binary opposition" have blocked the reconstruction of trust in China. China's current crisis of trust is not due to the collapse of traditional interpersonal trust, but rather the lack of modern universal trust. Therefore, how to build universal trust for modern society is an essential task for China's trust reconstruction. On the basis of revealing the mechanism of universal trust in modern society and combining with cultural-institutional duality theory, this article puts forward several paths of trust reconstruction in China. On the one hand, we should establish a set of modern institutional arrangements that are suitable for the universal trust, and on the other hand, the institutional norms should be enhanced to value consensus on social equity and justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15