检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨晓波[1] 芦晓博 Yang Xiao-bo Lu Xiao-bo(Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, Chin)
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学
出 处:《外语学刊》2018年第2期1-5,共5页Foreign Language Research
基 金:浙江理工大学哲学社会科学科研攀登计划项目(15116140-Y);浙江理工大学品牌专业建设计划项目“英语”(dbts201603)的阶段性成果
摘 要:“语言批判”这一哲学概念是由毛特纳提出的,维特根斯坦又对其进行了批评与发展。虽然两者旨趣不同,但可归纳出两个共同点:(1)批判的动因皆出于对语言不能表述真理的失望;(2)批判的目的都是解决(或消解)形而上学问题。本文首先以上述两点为基础定义语言批判,并扩展这一概念。然后,考察语言批判作为一种哲学方法在西方哲学中的运用。最后,发掘中国哲学的语言批判传统,并通过比较中西语言批判的不同方式,探析中西哲学的不同特质。The critique of language as a philosophical notion was first put forward by Fritz Mauthner and then criticized and developed by Ludwig Wittgenstein. Though it was explained and applied in different ways, common ground can still be found in the follo- wing two aspects : ( 1 ) the critique results from the failure of language to express the truth ; (2) the critique aims to solve or dis- solve the metaphysical problems. Based on the two points, this paper tries to define the critique of language, and then examines the application of this method in the Western philosophy. The paper also explores the tradition of Chinese philosophy's application of this method, and through a comparison of their different ways of application it explains the different features of Chinese and Western philosophies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117