学术腐败案件民事诉讼主体资格探究  

Research on the Subject of Civil Litigation in Academic Corruption Cases

作　　者：彭现堂[1] 

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2018年第2期105-116,共12页Journal Of CUPL

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目(教育廉政理论研究):"法律视角下高校学术腐败行为的防治研究"(项目批准号:16JDJYLZ03)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：针对学术腐败频发的现象,学者主要从民法、行政法和刑法等实体法的角度,阐述规制学术腐败的法律路径,鲜有从民事诉讼法的角度进行研究。在学术腐败案件中,权利人基于多种因素的考量,大都放弃维权;学术打假人为维护学术共同体的纯洁,揭发他人的侵权行为,却反被侵权人告上法庭。由于任意诉讼担当制度严格的适用条件和学术腐败案件的特殊性,使得学术打假人无法根据任意诉讼担当制度而获得诉讼实施权。团体诉讼因具有公益性、预防性和法定性等制度优势,可以发挥其在学术腐败案件中的功能,摆脱权利人不起诉、学术打假人被诉的尴尬局面。学术腐败案件应引入团体诉讼制度。Talking about the phenomenon of academic corruption,scholars mainly elaborate the legal path of regulating academic corruption from the perspective of substantive law such as civil law,administrative law and criminal law,and rarely study it from the perspective of civil procedural law.In the academic corruption case,the right person,based on the consideration of various factors,mostly give up the rights for protection,and the academic anticounterfeiting person is sued by the infringer for exposing others' infringement to defend the purity of the academic community.Due to the strict application of the arbitrary litigation system and the particularity of academic corruption cases,the academic counterfeiters cannot obtain the right of litigation according to the arbitrary litigation system.Because of its advantages such as public welfare,preventive and legality,group litigation can play its function in the academic corruption case,and get rid of the embarrassing situation that the right person does not prosecute and the academic anti-counterfeiting person is sued.It proposes that the system of group litigation should be introduced in academic corruption cases.

关 键 词：学术腐败 学术打假人 民事诉讼实施权 任意诉讼担当 团体诉讼 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]