检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘亦文 丁李平[2] 李毅 胡宗义[2] LIU Yi-wen1,2,3,4, DING Li-ping2 ,LI Yi2, HU Zong-yi2(1. International Business School, Hunan University of Commerce, Changsha 410205, China ; 2. College of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, China ; 3. Institute of Big Data and lnternet Innovation, Htman University of Comrneree, Changsha 410205, China ; 4. Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for New Retail Virtual Reality Technology, Hunan University of Commerce, Changsha 410205, Chin)
机构地区:[1]湖南商学院国际商学院,湖南长沙410205 [2]湖南大学金融与统计学院,湖南长沙410079 [3]湖南商学院大数据与互联网创新研究院,湖南长沙410205 [4]湖南商学院新零售虚拟现实技术湖南省重点实验室,湖南长沙410205
出 处:《中国软科学》2018年第3期36-46,共11页China Soft Science
基 金:国家社科基金(17BJY131)
摘 要:发展普惠金融是新时代中国加快推进金融业可持续均衡发展和金融改革创新的战略重心。从金融服务渗透性、服务可得性、使用效用性和可负担性四个维度出发,结合中国国情构建了中国普惠金融指标体系,基于变异系数法对2005-2015年中国各地区普惠金融水平进行了测度。研究发现,中国各地区普惠金融发展程度整体还比较低,各区域发展不均衡,但各地区普惠金融发展的势头良好。基于固定效应的面板门槛模型实证分析了普惠金融发展水平的不同阶段对经济增长影响的非线性关系。研究发现,普惠金融发展对经济增长的双门槛效应确实存在,门槛1和门槛2的估计值分别为0.279和0.405,当普惠金融发展水平低于0.279时,其对经济增长的作用是正向的,但并不显著;当金融发展水平大于0.405时,其系数为0.004,对经济增长也其显著正向作用,但其值大小明显降低;当金融发展水平大于0.279且小于0.405时,其系数为0.094,对经济增长起着显著促进作用。这些结论为我们下阶段推动普惠金融发展提供了重要的对策依据和新的思路。Development of Inclusive Finance is the strategic focus in accelerating balanced sustainable development and reform of China' s finance industry in the new era. This paper first establishes a System of China' s Inclusive Finance Index from 4 dimensions, including financial service permeability, service availability, applicability and affordability, and then measures the level of inclusive finance in China' s various regions during 2005 -2015 using the Coefficient of Variance method. The results show that despite the low and uneven development of China' s inclusive finance, its future prospect is encouraging. Panel Threshold Model based on Fixed Effect empirically studies the nonlinear impact of different stages of inclusive finance development on economic growth. The result is able to testify the existence of "dual threshold" effect of inclusive finance development on economic growth. The estimation result of Threshold 1 and Threshold 2 is 0. 279 and 0. 405 respectively. When the inclusive finance level is below 0. 279, its impact on economic growth is positive yet insignificant. When it is above 0. 405, with the coefficient of 0. 004, it has significant positive effect on economic growth, yet with a much lower value. When it' s between 0. 279 and 0. 405, its coefficient is 0. 094, implying a significant positive effect on economic growth. These results may offer new policy implications and insights on promoting China' s inclusive finance development in the future.
分 类 号:F061.2[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.215.45