从封闭走向融合——“中国体育史研究方向与方法”论坛综述  

From Closure to Integration:Chinese Sports History Direction and Method——Review of the Forum organized by“Sports and Science”

作　　者：黄美蓉[1] HUANG Meirong(1. China University of Minning and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Chin)

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学体育学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《体育与科学》2018年第2期114-120,共7页Sports & Science

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目<我国大学生体育生活化研究>;项目号:17FTY001

摘　　要：在改革开放40年,《体育与科学》创刊40年的背景下,《体育与科学》学术工作坊以"中国体育史研究方向与方法"为新年开篇,切合了十九大精神强调的文化自信,杂志30多年前在国内倡导的体育文化研究也有了生机。论坛讨论了中国体育史研究的差距与失范、体育史研究的方向与走势等问题,还就体育史研究的方法、史料收集的渠道和途径、体育口述史的操作和证据价值、口述史文本的甄别等问题进行了讨论。The 40th anniversary of reform and opening up, Jiangsu institute of sports science and ＂sports and science＂, Under the new era of the great Chinese dream and culture development, the forum begins with ＂Chinese Sports History Direction and Method＂, which corresponds to the cultural confidence emphasized by the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. The sports culture study that has being advocated by ＂Sports and Science＂ 30 years ago has also gained vitality. Experts put forward the prob- lems on the Chinese sports history such as textbook first and unique in the sports history, disparity and anomie in the sports history study, closure and silence of the sports history study. Experts believe that the sports history research integrating into the total histo- ry, into great humanistic background, into the context of globalization. Exports discussed and confronted on the basic methods of sports history, significance and collection channel of historical data and the authenticity of the oral history information. It is confirmed that the Chinese sports history research fuses multiple methods and has no indefinite method. It is also confirmed that the oral history and the field investigation are necessary methods to manifest international status, culture status and academic status of the Chinese sports history research. This is also a symbol of Great Cultural Power＇s cultural confidence.

关 键 词：中国体育史 体育口述史 体育史研究的方向与走势 

分 类 号：G80[文化科学—运动人体科学]