检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李永洪[1] 林士辉 LI Yong-hong ,LIN Shi-hui(Institute of Political Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, China)
机构地区:[1]西华师范大学政治学研究所,四川南充637009
出 处:《西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2018年第2期88-98,共11页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(13YJC810009);西华师范大学"地方政府治理"科研创新团队(CXTD2016-6)
摘 要:适时而系统地评估国内学界有关网络监督的研究状况,不仅有利于网络监督研究的知识增长,而且利于网络监督研究的质量提高。本文采取文献分析法,基于14项指标,对中国知网期刊数据库中网络监督研究论文的评估结果显示,15年来我国该领域的研究虽然取得了明显成就,但在发展方向、研究主体构成、研究议题和研究方法等方面仍有提升空间。在未来研究中应当正确看待网络监督研究的回落现象,促进研究主体多元化,丰富研究议题和研究方法,进而实现研究质量的再提升。Timely and systematic evaluation of the academic research on network supervision in China's academic circles is not only beneficial to the knowledge growth of network supervision research, but also to improving the re- search quality. Based on the fourteen indicators, this paper adopts the literature analysis method to evaluate the network supervision research papers in CNKI. It is found that although the research in this field has made remarka- ble achievements in the past 15 years, the development direction, the components of research subject, research topics and research methods still have room to be improved. In the future research we should take a correct view of the drop phenomenon of network supervision research, promote the diversification of research subjects, enrich re- search topics and research methods, hoping to further enhance the quality of research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15