“党内法规”的概念实用论——兼论法律概念的外部影响  

On the Pragmatic Utilization of the Concept of Inner-Party Regulations——also on the External Effect of Legal Concepts

作　　者：武小川[1] WU Xiaochuan

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学法学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《中共中央党校学报》2018年第2期44-52,共9页Journal of The Party School of The Central Committee of The C.T.C

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"依法治国与党内法规建设研究"(14AZD137)

摘　　要："党内法规是法"目前是论证"党内法规"概念合理性的主流观点,但是这个命题在法学领域却充满争议。从实用主义角度来看,目前并没有合适的概念可以替代"党内法规",使用"党内法规"的表述具有其必要性。在现代社会,法律概念在法律领域之外并不具有排他性效力,法律应当包容社会主体在法律领域之外赋予法律概念以不同含义。The proposition of ＂inner-party regulation is the law＂, which is widely accepted to justify the concept of ＂inner-party regulation＂, is still full of controversy in the realm of jurisprudence. This article analyzes the failure of the alternative concepts supported by some scholars in replacing ＂inner-party regulation＂. This article argues from the aspect of pragmatism that the concept of ＂inner-party regulation＂ is still necessary and should not be replaced. In modern society, legal concepts do not have coercive effects outside its scope of validity. The law should tolerate that people give different meanings to legal concepts outside the realm of law.

关 键 词：法 党内法规 规范 实用主义 条例 外部效力 

分 类 号：D262.13[政治法律—政治学]