紧缩论和公理化真理论的匹配性问题研究  

On Matching Problem Between Deflationism and Axiomatic Theories of Truth

作　　者：孙新会 李娜[2] SUN Xin-hui1 ＆ LI Na2(1. School of Marxism Studies, Hehei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China; 2. School of Philosophy, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, Chin)

机构地区：[1]河北经贸大学马克思主义学院,河北石家庄050061 [2]南开大学哲学院,天津300350

出　　处：《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期34-38,共5页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(12BZX059)

摘　　要：与实质真理论相反,紧缩论认为“真”是非实质的。起初基于保守性,公理化真理论以紧缩论作为其哲学依据,但保守性问题却充分暴露了二者各自存在的困境。一方面是由于紧缩论本身的不当承诺,使这种有瑕疵的理论不能作为刻画不同真谓词的公理化真理论的统一哲学解释;另一方面是由于多数公理化的真理论根本不满足基于基础理论的保守性。因此,这2种理论的匹配问题亟待新的探究。Deflationism, which is opposite to the substantial theory of truth, claims that truth is non-sub-stantial. At first, based on conservativity, deflationism was taken as the philosophical base of axiomatic theories of truth, but the conservativity problem fully exposed their dilemmas finally. On the one hand, due to the unacceptable commitments of deflationism, we cannot use this defective theory as a unified philosophical interpretation of the axiomatic theories of truth. As they describe different truth predicates. On the other hand, most axiomatic theories of truth do not satisfy the conservativity over base theory at all. Therefore, the matching of the two theories needs new researches urgently.

关 键 词：紧缩论 保守性 公理化真 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]