考茨基对马恩著作的吸纳与间距  

Kautsky's Absorption and Spacing on the Writings of Marx and Engels

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:唐永 张明[1] 徐军 TANG Yong, ZHANG Ming, XU Jun(School of Political Science, National Defense University, Shanghai 200092, Chin)

机构地区:[1]国防大学政治学院,上海200092

出  处:《学术探索》2018年第4期16-21,共6页Academic Exploration

基  金:2013年国家社科基金项目(13CZX003);2014年国家社科基金项目(14BKS098)

摘  要:考茨基晚年在他的哲学总结性著作《唯物主义历史观》中,采用与马恩持续不断对话的行文体例,通过引用和评析马恩经典话语的方式搭建理论骨架。不过,由于理论前结构的"带入"、文本接触中的"错乱"、理论的"高差"与"错位"和语境的历史性"滑动"等因素影响,考茨基的"唯物主义历史观"与马恩的历史唯物主义思想之间存在一定的间距,表现为实证主义倾向、弱经济决定论倾向和实践视野的缺失等方面。这集中体现在《唯物主义历史观》以马克思主义的显性话语和达尔文主义与实证主义等隐性话语之间持续较量的文本形态。In his later years' philosophical summary work Historical Materialism, Kautsky uses the writing style of ongoing dialogue with Marx and Engels, and builds his theoretical framework through references and analysis of Marx and Engels's classical discourse. However, due to "intervention" of the structure of the former theory, "disorder" of text contact, "elevation" and "dislocation" of theory and historical "sliding" of context, there is a certain distance between Kautsky's "materialist conception of history" and the historical materialism of Marx and Engels, with its positivism tendency, tendency of weak economic determinism and lack of practical vision. This is mainly embodied by the text form of constant contrast between the explicit discourse of Marxism and the implicit discourse of Darwinism and positivism in the book.

关 键 词:考茨基 唯物主义历史观 马恩著作 引用 

分 类 号:A811.1[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象