检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢子瑄 裴崇哲 孟舒[1] 李岩松[2] 夏静雯[2] LU Zi-xuan1,2, PEI Chong-zhe1, MENG Shu1, LI Yan-song2, XIA Jing-wen2(1 Department of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital Allfiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicinc, Shanghai, 200092, China; 2 Department of Cardiology, Seventh People's Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200137, Chin)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院心内科,上海200092 [2]上海中医药大学附属第七人民医院心内科,上海200137
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2018年第3期467-471,共5页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
摘 要:目的:探讨红细胞分布宽度(RDW)和超敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)对射血分数保留心衰(HFpEF)的诊断价值,为临床诊断提供资料。方法:研究共纳入2013年12月至2016年12月上海市第七人民医院收治的368例CHF患者,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析,用Logisitic回归分析确定HFpEF的独立危险因素,用ROC曲线分析确定RDW和hsCRP对于HFpEF诊断的最佳Cut-off值及其预测价值。结果:HFpEF患者的RDW(12.83±1.09)和hsCRP(8.70±17.81)水平显著低于非HFpEF组患者的RDW(13.58±1.20)和hsCRP(14.24±30.90)水平;较低的RDW(OR=1.831)和hsCRP(OR=1.003)是HFpEF的独立危险因素;对RDW和hsCRP进行ROC曲线分析,hsCRP的AUC为0.814[95%CI(0.758~0.871)],最佳鉴别界值为185.6;RDW的AUC为0.694[95%CI(0.624~0.764)],最佳鉴别界值为13.15。结论:HFpEF患者的RDW和hsCRP水平显著低于非HFpEF型心衰患者,RDW和hsCRP对于HFpEF均有较高的诊断价值,可作为临床诊断HFpEF的参考指标。Objective: To investigate the value of red blood cell distribution width(RDW) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hsCRP) in the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction(HFpEF). Methods: Three hundred and sixty-eight chronic heart failure patients in Shanghai 7 th people's hospital between December 2013 to December 2016, were enrolled. All clinical data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. The independent risk factor of HFpEF were analyzed with Logistics regression analysis. And the efficiency and accuracy of RDW and hsCRP on diagnosis of HFpEF were evaluated with ROC curve. Results: The level of RDW(12.83±1.09) and hsCRP(8.70±17.81) in HFpEF patients were siginificantly lower than non-HFpEF patients(RDW: 13.58±1.20, hsCRP: 14.24±30.90). Logistics regression analysis showed that RDW and hsCRP are independent risk factors of HFpEF patients.The AUC of RDW on diagnosis of HFpEF patients is 0.694 [95%CI(0.624~0.764)], with a best optimum boundary value of 13.15. The AUC of hsCRP on diagnosis of HFpEF patients is 0.814 [95% CI(0.758 ~0.871)], with a best optimum boundary value of 185.6.Conclusion: The level of RDW and hsCRP in HFpEF patients are significantly lower than that of non-HFpEF patients. The value of RDW and hsCRP on the diagnosis of HFpEF are high, which suggesting that RDW and hsCRP could be appropriate indicators on the clinical diagnosis of HFpEF.
关 键 词:红细胞分布容积 超敏C反应蛋白 射血分数保留心衰
分 类 号:R541.61[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.176