检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何振宏 张丹丹[1,2] He Zhenhon1,2, Zhang Dandan1,2(1.College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060) (2Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Cognitive Science, Shenzhan University, Shenzhen, 518060)
机构地区:[1]深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060 [2]深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室(深圳大学),深圳518060
出 处:《心理科学》2018年第2期403-409,共7页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金(31571120);国家基础研究计划(973项目;2014CB744600);广东省高等学校优秀青年教师培养计划资助项目(YQ2015143);深圳大学人文社会科学青年教师扶持项目(17QNFC43)的资助
摘 要:从社会决策角度出发,依托博弈论的经典范式是研究抑郁症病人人际与社会功能障碍的一个切入点。Ruff和Fehr(2014)提出在社会决策中存在三类情境,即社会反馈、替代性评价、社会原则。我们从这个理论框架出发,发现抑郁症病人在社会反馈加工中存在社会性快感缺失,对社会拒绝的敏感性增强;在替代性评价过程中,共情和心理理论能力减弱;抑郁症病人对决策中的社会原则(公平、合作)存在适应不良现象,如过度利他性。未来的研究一方面可进一步探索抑郁症病人的社会性快感缺失现象,另一方面可采用经颅电/磁刺激与脑成像技术结合或超扫描技术,提高研究结果的解释力和生态效度。Depression is associated with poor interpersonal and social functions. To improve the social dysflmction is the key component of successful intervention in depressed patients. Therefore, the review of this topic can further our understanding and promote potential clinical practice. To understand depressed patients' interpersonal and social dysfunction in the context of social decision-making, an advantage is that researchers can use game theory paradigms from neuroeconomics to examine interpersonal and social dysfunction in patients with depression. Ruff and Fehr (2014) proposed three classes of situations in social decision-making. First, it refers to assess how other individuals' valuation or feedback affect the agent's own well-being ("social feedback" for short). This class of social decision-making includes situations in which the agent experiences social rewards or punishment from oth--,ers, such as social acceptance or social rejection. The second class concerns situations in which an individual vicariously values choice options and outcomes for another individual, i.e., vicarious experiences of social rewards and punishment, vicarious social decision-making, and vicarious social learning ("vicarious valuation" for short). The third class comprises situations in which an individual values his or her behavior in a reference frame of normative social principles ("social principle" for short). Based on the three classes of the aforementioned situations, the current review summarized recent behavioral and fMRI studies on social decision-making in healthy adults as well as in patients with depression. For the situation of "social feedback", depressed individuals showed social anhedonia for positive social interaction and social reward, which may be due to reduced response from the nucleus accumbens. In contrast, patients had increased sensitivity to negative social interactions, such as social rejection or exclusion, which is associated with increased activation in the ne
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.143.240