检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李雪莹[1] 齐童[1] 刘传安[1] 张国庆[1] LI Xueying QI Tong LIU Chuanan ZHANG Guoqing
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院
出 处:《现代城市研究》2018年第4期45-55,共11页Modern Urban Research
基 金:北京市自然科学基金项目(8142008)
摘 要:以三山五园绿道为研究案例,通过ENVI中的非监督分类分析,提取出天际线比例、开阔度、绿视率和道路比例4个评价指标,利用美景度评价法(SBE)确定景观的丰富度与层次性、标志性景观的可见性和景观的自然性3个指标的基础值,结合熵值赋权法对7个指标的权重进行计算,最后建立了绿道景观美学评价模型。结果表明,三山五园绿道景观资源缺乏管控,规划建设水平不均一,由于城市化的影响,遭受不同程度的侵蚀,景观美学质量存在明显差异,不能充分发挥其美学功能、游憩功能及生态功能等。Taking Three Hills and Five Gardens Greenway as a case study, the unsupervised classification analysis of ENVI was used to extract four evaluation indicators of skyline proportion, openness, green vision ratio and road proportion, and the beauty of the landscape was determined by SBE. The basic values of richness and gradation, visibility of landmarks, and naturalness of landscapes were used to calculate the weights of the seven indicators based on the entropy weighting method. Finally, an aesthetic evaluation model for greenway landscapes was established. The results show that the landscape resources of Three Hills and Five Gardens Greenway lack of management and control, and the level of planning and construction is not uniform. Due to the impact of urbanization, it suffers from erosion of different degrees. There are obvious differences in landscape aesthetic quality, and it cannot fully exert its aesthetic functions, recreational functions and ecological functions.
关 键 词:风景园林 美学质量评价 模型归纳 绿道 三山五园
分 类 号:TU985[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147