我国刑事司法中的缺席审判——基于刑事诉讼特别没收程序的观察与思考  

The Default Trial of Criminal Justice in China——Observation and think of special confiscation procedure

作　　者：钱文杰 QIAN Wen-jie(Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310008 Chin)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《河北法学》2018年第4期141-153,共13页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目<中国特色社会主义司法制度的模式;规律与改革方向研究>(14AKS009);最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题<起诉标准与定罪标准关系研究>(GJ2017C23)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：刑事司法中的缺席审判,是域外国家、地区刑事审判制度的重要组成部分。我国2012年《刑事诉讼法》增设刑事诉讼特别没收程序,是指法院在犯罪嫌疑人、被告人未被定罪前提下,一种追缴其违法所得及其他涉案财产的司法裁定行为,是中国式可缺席刑事审判的制度起源。《刑事诉讼法》第五编第三章新增特别没收程序之规定,在立法层面已经确立了其与其他没收所不同的特征,无论是在前提条件,实质条件,还是形式条件等方面都其个性。在特别没收程序的具体适用中,则是通过证据规则进行规制,利害关系人、检察机关和法院等多方群体参与,一定程度保证特别没收程序的公平正义。The default trial in criminal proceedings is an important part of the criminal justice system of foreign countries and regions. The special confiscation in criminal procedure,refers to the court under the precondition of the criminal suspect or defendant has not been convicted,recovering its illegal income and other judicial rulings of the property involved,and it＇s the origin of the Chinese system that can be default from criminal trial. The criminal procedural law of 2012 add a new special confiscation procedure rules in the chapter three,title five,at the legislative level has established its contrary to the criterions for the conviction of different application characteristics,whether in the premise condition,essential condition,or formal conditions differ from normal procedure. In the special procedure,by legal basis and evidence rules of interested party,procuratorate and court of various groups to participate in,to a certain extent to ensure the justice of special procedure.

关 键 词：刑事司法 缺席审判 特别没收 适用条件 证据规则 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]