不同深度及形状的土层GNSS观测站建设试验  

Test of Soil-Based GNSS Stations with Different Depth and Shapes

作　　者：胡亚轩[1] 王建华[1] 张锐 秦姗兰[1] HU Yaxuan1 ,WANG Jianhua1, ZHANG Rui2, QIN Shanlan1(1The Second Monitoring and Application Center, CEA, 316 Xiying Road, Xi＇an 710054, China; 2 National Earthquake Infrastructure Service, 56 Sanlihe Road, Beijing 100029, Chin)

机构地区：[1]中国地震局第二监测中心,西安市西影路316号710054 [2]地壳运动监测工程研究中心,北京市三里河路56号100045

出　　处：《大地测量与地球动力学》2018年第4期422-425,共4页Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics

基　　金：国家重大科技基础设施项目(CMONOCⅡ-YJ-2011-03);国家自然科学基金(41372345)~~

摘　　要：通过对土层深度大于100m的陕西杨凌试验场地3个不同埋深及形状GNSS观测墩的GPS、电磁波测距及水准观测结果进行比对,定量分析各墩的垂向及墩间距离变化,得出较优的观测墩建设设计方案。结果表明,直接采用土模、埋深8m的试验墩综合指标最好,带有承重底盘埋深3m的观测墩次之,埋深5m的最差。试验结果可为我国西部土层区域同类观测墩建设提供设计依据。Based on observations from GPS,EDM and leveling, different depth and shapes is analyzed. The stations are in Yang is more than 100 m. Comparing the changes of the distance and the deformation of three stations with ling, Shaanxi, where the depth of soil subsidence between the three stations and GNSS continuous station SNYL, we can choose a better and more reasonable construction design for soil-based stations. The results show that stations with an 8 m depth, which is built directly with soil modulus, has better indicators than others, being more stable and using fewer workers, less material and reduced cost. The station with a 3 m depth is better than that with 5 m depth. The experimental results can provide the design foundation for the same standard of soil-based stations in the western area of China.

关 键 词：土层观测墩 水准 GPS 电磁波测距 建设设计 

分 类 号：P225[天文地球—大地测量学与测量工程] P228[天文地球—测绘科学与技术]