集体土地养老支持的区位差异及政策启示——基于广州和佛山地区的实证  

The Locational Difference of Collective Land Chinese for Rural Social Security:Based on An Empirical Study from Guangzhou and Foshan Area

作　　者：赵渺希[1] 王慧芹[1] 刘明欣[1] ZHAO miaoxi;WANG Huiqin;LIU Mingxin

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学建筑学院

出　　处：《农业经济问题》2018年第3期134-143,共10页Issues in Agricultural Economy

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目“多中心网络视角下特大城市的就业—居住空间匹配研究”(编号:51478189)

摘　　要：改革开放以来,集体土地的社会保障功能是制定相关政策的主要考虑因素。本文以广州、佛山（广佛）地区为例,通过问卷及访谈分析不同区位的集体土地家庭养老、社会养老及土地养老方式的级差效应,并重点分析土地养老的方式及其受区位影响的程度。研究发现,即使是广佛地区这一发达的城市连绵区,区域内部集体土地的养老支持功能也存在明显的区位级差效应,只有城镇化地区（城中村）的集体土地才能提供充足的养老支持,偏远乡村绝对土地收益低下、难以获取非农经营收入;即使在发达的城市连绵区,＂集体土地是农村社会保障主要来源＂的假设前提也已不具普适性。建议对集体土地施行基于区位和使用方式的财税政策,并通过转移支付提升偏远地区的社会福利水平。Since the reform and opening up,the social security function of collective land has been the main consideration in formulating relevant policies. We analyzed the effect of different location among the rural family-supporting,social elder security and land-supporting in Guangzhou and Foshan.Besides focused on analysing the way of land-based pensions and the extent impact from the different location by questionnaires and interviews. The study found that the function of supporting the elderly in the collective land has obvious locational different effects. Only the collective land in urbanized areas can provide adequate social security support. And most of the collective land cannot be the main source of rural social security. Therefore,review the relevant land policies and implement the appropriate fiscal and taxation policies in different location of the collective land are necessary. In addition,it would be able to improve the social security of the remote rural areas by the transfer of payments.

关 键 词：集体土地 社会保障 养老支持 区位级差效应 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济]