司法策略的合法性建构:以乡村司法为背景  

The Legitimization of Judicial Strategy:on the Background of Adjudication in Rural Areas

作　　者：王籍慧 Wang Jihui(Jilin University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization, Chang Chun 130012)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学司法文明协同创新中心,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《重庆社会科学》2018年第4期81-89,共9页Chongqing Social Sciences

摘　　要：中国社会正处于现代化转型期,传统纠纷解决方式的衰退以及乡村司法所遭遇的阻碍为司法策略的产生提供了契机。我国当前司法策略的建构逻辑是一种"问题—策略"逻辑,这一逻辑本身具有一定的缺陷,容易迷失在诸多"问题"当中,忽略司法策略本身的合法性建构。从"问题—策略"逻辑向"目的—手段"逻辑的转向是建构司法策略的前提,更能契合于司法策略的内在合法性建构。基于"目的—手段"逻辑,司法策略的合法性建构可以从目的和手段两方面进行:司法策略目的的合法性规制取决于政治治理目的和司法良好运行目的之间的平衡;司法策略手段的合法性建构必须依托于它作为法官与当事人之间一种程序性互动方式本身的规范性建构。China nowadays is under modernization transformation. The recession of traditional dispute settlement methods and the obstruction adjudication encounters in rural areas provide an opportunity for the development of judicial strategy. The logic of ＂problem-strategy＂ constitutes the logic that forms the judicial strategy, which has many limitations, including that those judicial strategies are likely to lost it-self in the ＂problems＂, and ignoring legitimization of itself. The transition of logic from ＂problem-strategy＂ to ＂ends-means＂ is the first step. The legitimization of judicial strategies can be achieved in terms of the two aspects of the new logic： the legitimization of the ends of judicial strategies depends on the balance of the two ends of state governance and judicial operation; and the legitimization of the means of judicial strategies relies on the normativity of the procedural interactions between judges and the participants in judicial process.

关 键 词：司法策略 乡村司法 国家治理 程序性互动 

分 类 号：DF59[政治法律—民商法学]