检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘丽 刘士李 谢涛[2] 朱晓虎 LIU Li;LI Shili;XIE Tao;ZHU Xiaohu(Anhui Electric Power Company Research Institute of Economy and Technology, State Grid, Hefei 230009, China;Anhui Electric Power Company, State Grid, Hefei 230009, China)
机构地区:[1]国网安徽省电力公司经济技术研究院,安徽合肥230009 [2]国网安徽省电力公司,安徽合肥230009
出 处:《工程经济》2018年第3期5-9,共5页ENGINEERING ECONOMY
基 金:国家电网公司科学技术项目"电力管线纳入城市地下综合管廊的经济政策分析"(107-433834)
摘 要:电力管线入廊有两种方式,一是电力公司租用政府全资的地下综合管廊,二是电力公司投资PPP模式的综合管廊。鉴于此,阐述电力管线纳入综合管廊的两种模式,并分析这两种模式的经济性。在此基础上,提出电力管线纳入城市地下综合管廊的发展对策,包括模式的选择,以及综合管廊的收费机制等,为相关项目的建设提供参考。Power companies have two ways to access electric power pipes into utility tunnel. One way is to rent utility tunnel and pay the usage fees,the other way is to directly invest the construction of utility tunnel by PPP model. This paper compares the different ways of electric power pipes into utility tunnel and traditional power transmission project,and analyzes the economic of the two ways. Based on this,proposes suggestions to improve the construction of utility tunnels,including the selection of the model and the charging mechanism of utility tunnel,in order to provide references for the construction of related projects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43