论民初田宅买卖契约法中的物权行为理论及其当代启示  

An analysis of the Juristic Acts of Real Rights in the Contract Law of Homestead Bargaining in the Early Republic of China

作　　者：刘海波[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学法学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第2期96-101,共6页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)

摘　　要：民初在田宅买卖契约法中对于物权变动采取意思主义模式,并不要求田宅物权变动具备一定的外在形式,并且区分债权契约与物权契约,认可物权行为的独立性,但并无物权行为无因性适用的空间。故民初田宅买卖契约法中所体现出的物权行为理论可谓是有因的物权意思主义,此乃近代中国民法对外来法律综合继受的反映,可以说具有相当的特殊性甚至矛盾性。民初此种"独特"物权行为理论的出现对于我国当代民法典的编纂亦有一定的启示意义。Contract Law of Homestead Bargaining in the Early Republic of China distinguishes the obligation contract from the contract of real rights. It takes the meaning itself as the principle of the real rights transfer though doesn't require external forms. To some degree,it recognizes the independence and the no-cause character of juristic acts of real rights. Since the law was made under the influence of foreign laws at that point,it serves as a precursor for the Civil Law today.

关 键 词：民初 田宅买卖契约 物权行为 启示 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]