检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈玉海 吴越剑 Shen Yuhai;Wu Yuejian(Nanj in Jinshan Automobile Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd., Nanj ing 210019, China)
机构地区:[1]南京金杉汽车工程塑料有限责任公司,江苏南京210019
出 处:《广东化工》2018年第8期105-106,共2页Guangdong Chemical Industry
摘 要:采用机械性能、流动性和收缩率测量的方法,比较了两种EPDM和八种POE弹性体对PP+PE-EPDM复合材料性能的影响。发现不同弹性体增韧的材料,其流动性、刚性和收缩率均有较大差别,而且它们平行于流动方向的收缩率均大于垂直于流动方向的收缩率。其中4#弹性体的综合效果最好。与EPDM相比,POE对体系的流动性影响小,增韧效果好。对刚性的影响,两者相差不大。By measuring mechanical properties, flow ability, and shrinkage, the influence of elastomer on properties of PP+PE-EPDM is studied, which is toughened by different elastomers , including 8 types of POE and 2 types of EPDM. The results show that the fluidity, toughness and shrinkage of the materials toughened by different elastomers are different greatly. Moreover, the shrinkage rates parallel to the flow direction are greater than that in the direction perpendicular to the flow direction. The 4# elastomer of them has the best comprehensive effect. Compared with EPDM, POE has little influence on the flt.idity of the system. The toughening effect is good The influence on the rigidity is similar.
分 类 号:TB332[一般工业技术—材料科学与工程] TQ325.14[化学工程—合成树脂塑料工业]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28