认罪认罚从宽制度中的证据法问题  

On Evidence Regulations in Leniency System for Guilt Admission and Punishment Acceptance

作　　者：艾明[1] AI Ming(School of Criminal Investigation, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学刑事侦查学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《山东警察学院学报》2018年第1期49-56,共8页Journal of Shandong Police College

基　　金：2016年西南政法大学引进人才科研资助项目"侦查程序法治化与公民基本权利保障问题研究"(项目批准号:2016-XZRCXM006);西南政法大学校级重点项目(项目编号:2017XZZD-12)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：随着认罪认罚从宽制度适用范围的扩展以及适用时点的提前,有必要构建相应的证据规则。在认罪协商失败后,对被告人的认罪陈述应当限制使用。通过不正协商方式获得的认罪陈述应当排除。对被告人认罪陈述的证明力应当加强审查。对认罪认罚案件的证明标准,应兼顾传统刑事诉讼原则与此类案件审理程序上的特点,分层次、分类型地进行设定。With the extension of application scope of leniency system for guilt admission and punishment acceptance and advanced application point,it is necessary to establish relevant evidence regulations. After the failure to negotiate guilt admission,statement of guilt admission by defendants shall be restricted for use.Statement of guilt admission shall be excluded through improper negotiation. We shall make greater efforts to examine probative force of defendants＇ guilt admission and work out regulations by different levels and types,combining traditional criminal litigation principles with characteristics of case-handling procedures.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽制度 认罪协商 认罪陈述 证据能力 证明力 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]