检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李磊[1] 胡辉 郑晓玮 江守伟[1] 沈强[1] Li Lei;Hu Hui;Zheng Xiaowei(Department of Infectious Disease, Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, Anhui Province, China)
出 处:《实用肝脏病杂志》2018年第3期417-420,共4页Journal of Practical Hepatology
基 金:安徽省科技厅自然科学基金资助项目(编号:1208085QH147)
摘 要:目的比较终末期肝病模型(MELD)及其衍生模型iMELD、MELD-Na和MESO对乙型肝炎相关性慢加急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)患者12周生存预后的评估价值。方法按照现行中国肝衰竭诊治指南的诊断标准纳入67例HBV-ACLF患者,收集患者诊断成立时的相关实验室检测指标,分别计算MELD、iMELD、MELD-Na和MESO模型评分,应用Med Calc 15.8软件分析比较受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),确定MELD及其衍生评分系统对ACLF患者12周死亡风险预测的最佳截断点和约登指数,以评价不同评分预测ACLF患者短期生存的效能。结果在治疗12周内,在67例HBV-ACLF患者中,死亡45例(67.2%);入组时,生存组MELD、iMELD、MELD-Na和MESO评分分别为(22.12±3.24)、(41.59±5.30)、(22.55±4.07)和(1.64±0.24),显著低于死亡组【分别为(30.47±9.01)、(51.88±11.09)、(32.35±11.58)和(2.28±0.70),P<0.01】;MELD、i MELD、MELD-Na和MESO模型预测患者12周生存的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.814、0.802、0.806和0.817,其最佳截断点分别为22.70、47.76、22.16和1.69,约登指数分别为0.5040、0.5535、0.4808和0.4818,提示四种模型的预测效能比较,均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论MELD、i MELD、MELD-Na和MESO四种评分系统对于HBV-ACLF患者12周生存情况均具有良好的预测能力,可根据实际情况,选择应用。Objective To validate the prediction of short-term survival by four scoring systems based onmodels for end-stage liver disease(MELD)in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B-induced liver failure(HBV -ACLF) . Methods 67 patients with HBV -ACLF were enrolled in this study between April 2015 andOctober 2017. The clinical parameters were collected for calculation of MELD, iMELD, MELD -Na and MESOscores, respectively. The predictive efficacy on forecasting survival of patients with HBV -ACLF by the fourscoring systems was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)supported by MedCalc15.8 software.Results 45(67.2%)out of 67 patients with HBV-ACLF died within 12 weeks; the scores of MELD, iMELD,MELD-Na and MESO models at presentation in survival group were (22.12±3.24) , (41.59±5.30) , (22.55±4.07)and(1.64±0.24) , much lower than (30.47±9.01) , (51.88±11.09) , (32.35±11.58)and(2.28±0.70) , respectively, P〈0.01in the dead group; the area under the ROC curve(AUC)in forecasting the survival of patients with HBV-ACLF by the four models were 0.814, 0.802, 0.806 and 0.817 respectively, the cut -off -values were22.70, 47.76, 22.16 and 1.69, and the Jordan index were 0.5040, 0.5535, 0.4808 and 0.4818, respectively, suggestingno significant differences between them (P〉0.05) . Conclusion The four scoring systems base on MELD havegood predictive efficacy on forecasting 12 weeks’survival in patients with HBV-ACLF, which hints they might beapplied in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.184.21