检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王超[1] WANG Chao(Hebei Politics and Law Career Academy, Shijiazhuang Hebei 050061, China)
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2018年第1期34-40,共7页Journal of Henan Police College
基 金:河北政法职业学院2017年研究课题"电信诈骗犯罪特征及对策问题实证研究"(ZF20170601)的最终研究成果
摘 要:近年来,我国电信诈骗犯罪持续高发。通过对中国裁判文书网1152例电信诈骗犯罪案件进行实证研究,分析我国电信诈骗犯罪的特征及我国司法机关应对效能差异,结果显示:电信诈骗犯罪各年度及各地区分布不均,8个重点地区的犯罪比例较高;犯罪人的人口学特征与犯罪学特征差异明显。在司法应对方面:检察机关的处理效能和法院的审理效能相对较高,而公安机关的打击效能有待提升;电信诈骗犯罪的持续高发态势仍将持续;有效打击该类犯罪依然任重道远。In recent years,China' s telecommunications fraud sustained high incidence.Through the empirical study of 1152 cases of Telecom fraud crime in China Judgments Online,this paper analyzes the characteristics of China' s telecommunications fraud crime and the differences of judicial response effectiveness.The results show that telecommunication fraud crimes are unevenly distributed in different years and provinces,and the proportion of crimes in eight key areas is higher.There are obvious differences between the criminal' s de-mographic characteristics and criminological characteristics.As for the judicial response,the handling efficiency of the procuratorates and the court' s trial efficiency are relatively high,while the crackdown effectiveness of the pub-lic security units needs to be improved.As the high incidence of telecommunications fraud will continue,there is still a long way to go for effective fight against such crimes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28