检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟帅[1] 徐鹏 王宏[1] 傅秀民[1] 曹立勇[1] 程式华[1] 沈希宏[1] MengShuai;XuPeng;Wang Hong;FuXiumin;CaoLiyong;ChengShihua;ShenXihong(China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006)
机构地区:[1]中国水稻研究所,杭州310006
出 处:《分子植物育种》2018年第7期2249-2254,共6页Molecular Plant Breeding
基 金:863计划(2014AA10A603);国家公益性农业科技研究专项(201403002);中国农业科学院创新工程超级稻育种创新团队和水稻杂种优势研究机理研究创新团队(CAAS-ASTIP-2013-CNRRI)共同资助
摘 要:以程氏指数法和SSR分子标记法对主要5份育成长粒粳稻亲本和其他辅助试验材料进行了籼粳属性鉴别。结果表明,程氏指数法中3份表现偏粳,2份表现粳性;而在SSR分子标记法中,5份均表现粳性。相比较而言,粒型作为程氏指数指标之一,影响了籼粳属性指数,分子标记方法相对准确。The indica and japonica differentiation of the parents of five main developed long-grain hybrid japonica rice and other auxiliary test materials were identified by Cheng's index method and SSR-marked method. The results showed that in Cheng's index method, three of them were japonicalinous type and the other two showed japonica type. Nevertheless, all of the five parents were japonica type when SSR-marked method was used. Grain shape, regarded as one of parameters, impacted the indiccdjaponica attribute index, which might ultimately influence the accuracy of Cheng's index method. By contrast, molecule-marked method was more accurate for indica/japonica attribute differentiation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46