检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴瑞林
出 处:《建筑学报》2018年第4期110-115,共6页Architectural Journal
摘 要:从学术史的角度指出了哥特建筑研究从技术到精神转向之间的断裂,正是主流学者们对哥特建筑"东方来源说"的忽视导致了这一转向的中间环节的缺失。文章通过对19世纪末至二战前兴盛的"东方来源说"的细致分析,将其定位为伪装成技术问题的精神概念,为二战后的"象征性解读"提供了可参照的对象;从这一层面来说,被忽视的"东方来源说"沟通了"象征性解读"与"技术性解读"的断裂,保持了学术史的连贯性,进而得以重拾缺失的"来源"。From the perspective of academic history, the paper points out a gap from technology to spiritual transformation in the study of Goth architecture. It is the mainstream scholars' ignorance of the "Oriental Contribution" to Gothic architecture that resulted in the lack of intermediate links in this transition. This paper aims to position it as a spiritual concept disguised as a technical issue through the analysis of "Oriental Contribution" that flourished from the end of the 19th century to World War II, and provides reference to "symbolic interpretation" thereafter. On this level, the idea of "Oriental Contribution" reconsiders the missing origins and connects "symboLic interpretation" and "technical interpretation", maintaining the continuity of academic history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3