检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李耿[1,2] 程煜华 郭宇博[4] 刘立营[3] 贾蔷[2] 李振坤 张秀梅 杨洪军[2,5] LI Geng;CHENG Yu-hua;GUO Yu-bo;LIU Li-ying;JIA Qiang;LI Zhen-kun;ZHANG Xiu-mei;YANG Hong-jun(China-Japan Friendship Hospital Beijing, 100029, China;China Association of Chinese Medicine, Big Brand Traditional Chinese Medicine League, Beijing 100070, China;Wanfang Data Co. , Ltd. , Beijing 100038, China;Research and evaluation office China Association of Chinese medicine, Beijing 100029, China;Institute of Chinese Materia Medica;China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100070, Chin)
机构地区:[1]中日友好医院,北京100029 [2]中华中医药学会中药大品种联盟,北京100070 [3]北京万方数据股份有限公司,北京100038 [4]中华中医药学会研究与评价办公室,北京100029 [5]中国中医科学院中药研究所,北京100070
出 处:《中国现代中药》2018年第1期6-13,共8页Modern Chinese Medicine
基 金:中国科协学会能力提升项目;国家知识产权局委托项目
摘 要:目的:当前,随着我国医药改革的深入,以临床价值、科学价值为核心的科技创新驱动,成为中药产业发展的核心推动力。为科学、合理地评估中药大品种的临床价值、科技价值,展示传播中药科技创新成就,引导中药大品种培育的方向,中华中医药学会发布了《中药大品种科技竞争力报告(2017版)》。方法:立足公开数据和充分凝聚业内共识,明确了产品遴选原则和入围产品,确定了评估指标、指标权重,构建起中药大品种科技竞争力评估模型体系,得到各产品科技因子评分。结果:形成全品类百强榜、各省区排行榜、各治疗领域等系列中药大品种科技竞争力榜单,全景式展示了中药大品种科技竞争力概况。结论:报告入围品种代表了目前的中药产品科技创新的主流,报告显示我国中药产业科技竞争力呈现出明显的区域发展不平衡;科技创新已成当前中成药发展的燃眉之急。Objective: At present, with the deepening of China' s medical reform, the core of science and technolo- gy innovation driven by clinical value and scientific value has become the core driving force for the development of Chinese medicine industry. In order to scientifically and reasonably evaluate the clinical value and scientific value of the big brand tradi- tional Chinese medicine, and display the direction of propagating Chinese traditional medicine' s scientific and technological innovation and guiding the cultivation of big brand traditional Chinese medicine, the Chinese Academy of traditional Chinese Medicine released the report on the scientific and technological competitiveness of big brand traditional Chinese medicine (2017 Edition). Methods: Based on the open data and fully condensing of the industry consensus, we made clear the principles of product selection and the shortlisted products, identified the evaluation index and index weight, constructed the evaluation model system of the competitiveness of Chinese traditional medicine, and obtained the score of each technology factor. Results : The list of all kinds of top 100, the list of each provinces or regions and the scientific and technological competitiveness list of Chinese traditional medicine varieties were established. Conclusion: The reported big brands traditional Chinese medicine re- present the mainstream of technological innovation of traditional Chinese medicine products. The report shows that the competi- tiveness of Chinese traditional medicine industry displays a significant imbalance in regional development. Technological innova- tion has become the urgent need for the development of Chinese patent medicine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222