主观过错在行政处罚中的地位研究——兼论行政处罚可接受性  

Study on the Status of Subjective Fault in Administrative Penalty——And the theory of the Acceptability of Administrative Penalty

作　　者：张春林[1] ZHANG Chun-lin(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chonging 401120 China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《河北法学》2018年第5期97-106,共10页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：囿于行政处罚法没有明文规定,理论界就主观过错的地位形成了归责原则和构成要件的两大歧见,势必严重影响了行政处罚的实施。国家公权力在特定情形下得以介入社会籍以维护秩序,故"必要的恶"具有坚实的法哲学背景。仅依据立法的明文规定界定主观过错在行政处罚中的地位,符合形式法治的要求,却相悖于法治理论乃至行政法治理论的发展。超越立法的明文规定,将主观过错作为行政处罚构成要件,不仅满足行政处罚的本质要求和价值基础,而更能贴近实质法治的本质。Constrained by law on administrative punishments which has no clear stipulation,the theoretical circle formed two big different ideas as to the status of subjective fault which are the imputation principle and components. Such differences will severely affect the implementation of the administrative penalty. The public power of the state can intervene in the social matters in certain circumstances to maintain social order,so ＂necessary evil ＂ has a solid legal philosophy background. It meets the requirement of formal rule of law to define the status of subjective fault in administrative penalty according to the legislation,but it is contrary to the theory of rule of law and the development of the theory of administrative rule of law. Beyond the explicit stipulation of legislation,the subjective fault,as an important component of administrative penalty,not only satisfies the essential requirement and value basis of administrative penalty,but also can be close to the essence of the real rule of law.

关 键 词：主观过错 行政处罚 构成要件 实质法治 

分 类 号：DF312[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]